Share on Facebook
J. K. Rowling, a transphobe assumed ? The formal positions of the author of Harry Potter does not seem to be in any case not to the taste of his fans.
J. K. Rowling, the author of the saga Harry Potter plunges into a controversy. On Twitter, the writer has held about reprehensible against persons trans. At the point of disappoint its fans. MCE TV tells you everything from A to Z.
For more than 20 years, Harry Potter won the hearts of fans around the world. So, it was Impossible not to know the name of J. K. Rowling, novelist billionaire, whose saga continues to inspire.
Yet, his glory does not seem to excuse his comments made on Twitter. It is therefore on the social network of Jack Dorsey as the mother of the sorcerer the most well-known on the planet has dug his grave.
So all of it is part of a tweet in which J. K. Rowling complains, then the use of a term that escapes him. It says that a media title of his article in a way inclusive…
This punchline has in any case not delighted everyone, and especially not the LGBT community+. Since then, everyone seems to boycott and discredit it.
Including the fans of Harry Potter for the first time, who regretted that the author of the saga is ” transphobe “. As many trans people have found refuge by immersing himself in his universe.
J. K. Rowling, to whom we owe the series of Harry Potter books, is it really ignored by its fans because of his positions against trans people ? It helps you to see more clearly.
J. K. Rowling: assumes-does it really its transphobia ?
Twitter does not spare J. K. Rowling. Put in the sauce, in danger of being ” cancelled “, his words were not at all unanimous…
For this, we need to go back to the Saturday, June 6, the day that Joanne K. Rowling has posted this tweet , which panics the Canvas further. On this day, Devex published an article titled as : ” creating a world that is post-Covid-19, more egalitarian for people who have their rules “.
The words are simple, inclusive, who do not deny the existence of persons trans. That is to say, people assigned female or male at birth, with a gender identity other.
This allows to speak about trans men, who have not undergone surgery and who keep their genitalia says ” female “. Remember that any trans person does not necessarily by the phase ” scalpel “ to become a woman or a man.
Face it, J. K. Rowling says and responds : “I am sure thatthere was a word for these people. Help me. Fammes ? Fommes ? Fimmes ? “not without a hint of sarcasm.
As you say it has not gone unnoticed on the Canvas… The main interested.e.s was in any case not seen a good eye , and responded with a quarter turn.
It doesn’t help that in his case, Joanne responded by defending that trans women served the cause of women… Because they ” invisibilisent “ women in the biological sense of the term, ” she says.
J. K. Rowling is, therefore, not very partisan of a convergence of struggles, much to the chagrin of fans ofHarry Potter. It is also not the first time she takes such remarks.
Earlier, she defended the employee, returned after having been about equally condemnable on trans women. Not very LGBT-friendly…
June 6, 2020
The author of Harry Potter began to back the LGBT community+
Needless to say thatHarry Potter has seduced and seduced even beyond the generations. If films and novels have reached a wide audience, the LGBT community also has found refuge.
Therefore, we can understand why such words could offend the fans. The author of the saga, which has sold the dream for nearly 20 years ned simply their existence.
In a forum of the World, Olivia Chaumont, activist of the cause, trans, believes that the genre ” is not between the legs but between the ears “. What that says about J. K. Rowling and her followers.
A magic wand, J. K. Rowling has changed her name to a nickname the more masculine. A choice that seems to be far from trivial and that he could come back like a boomerang.
The idea was, just as George Sand, in her time, blend in with the mass of perpetrators male. Thus, it has been a ” recognition “ as a man, which is ironic for a woman who defends the idea that ” sex [biological] is real “ !
If the author wanted to pretend to be an ” author “, does it not also usurped that identity, as she complains to trans people ? His position on the subject was in any case quite disappointing.
To the point where this is reflected also on his career and his work… Of the publishers refuse to publish his next books, while the authors of his publishing house have just left the ship !
Things go from bad to worse for Joanne, who does nothing to exculpate himself. His fans will also turn to the back.
June 9, 2020
Harry Potter: when fans and players to separate the artist from the work
In addition to its faithful readers, several actors of the adaptation on the big screen have condemned his remarks. Daniel Radcliffe, who plays the sorcerer in glasses has even opened the ball :
“To all the people who now feel that their experience of the books has been tarnished or diminished, I am deeply sorry for the pain these comments have caused “, he said in an open letter. Very soon, he is followed by his co-stars, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint.
For their part, the fans of the saga are wondering if it is not necessary to separate the work of the artist. On Twitter, some of them were thinking squarely to remove their tattoos related to Harry Potter !
A small number of people say “queer “(see ” bizarre “) were then through some of the same characters. ” These books were very important to me, because I grew up queer in a small town very homophobic “, one reads in one of the interviews of MEL Magazine.
“His views on the biological sex affect me particularly, because I recently accepted my non-binarity, and I’m sick of being told that there are only women who have their rules “, said one of the interviewees.
Others believe thatHarry Potter ” does not really belong to J. K. Rowling, but us “. And the fact that ” the beautiful things that are born of Harry Potter are not from books, but the readership “.
Moral of the story : if the about the author angry always a large number, the fans were able to take ownership of his work. Then, udo page turns-t-it to J. K. Rowling ? Case to follow…