Paulina Smaszcz appealed to Katarzyna Cichopek. What did the ex-husband's current partner ask for?
Paulina Smaszcz appeals to Cichopek. About what?
As the “Pomponik” portal reminds, the surname Paulina Smaszcz regularly appears on the headlines of newspapers and gossip portals. All in connection with the numerous allegations she makes against her ex-husband, his partner and a few other people who decided to assess her attitude. Now, Smaszcz returns with an appeal addressed to Katarzyna Cichopek. What did she appeal to her ex-husband's current partner for?
It's been 3 years since the divorce
Paulina Smaszcz and Macije Kurzajewski divorced 3 years ago. They then managed to avoid public laundry and agreed on the division of the jointly accumulated property. After the marriage broke up, it was Kurzajewski who got their house. He lived there alone, although some time ago, the presenter's mother moved in here.
It was in the house in Straje Miłosna that Paulina Smaszcz was to appear in Kurzajewski's absence. The presenter decided to report the violation of home privacy by his ex-wife, who, in his opinion, is harassing his ailing mother. Smaszcz denied this in an extensive statement.
She admitted in it that she was actually in the house that once belonged to her, but not to intrude on her former mother-in-law, but to check – at the request sons – whether the dog Bono lives with Maciej Kurzajewski. By the way, she said that it was thanks to her that Kurzajewski did not lose his job at TVP, from which he was supposedly fired.
Change of strategy
Many people are of the opinion that Smaszcz should stop the attacks on her ex-husband as soon as possible, because it greatly strains her own image and weakens her position. It is not known whether Smaszcz took these remarks to heart, but she certainly changed her current media conflict strategy.
Smaszcz expressed surprise in the latest entry that she and Katarzyna Cichopek are presented as “antagonists”. She decided to draw the attention of Kurzajewski's new partner to what, in her opinion, her ex-husband really is.
She described him as “a father without value” and “a man without honor. She also did not fail to remind him that that from a person voting for PO he quickly became a “conservative follower of the PiS religion”.
“Please pay attention to his actions and morality. There is not an ounce of truth and declared values in this attitude and image,” she said.
What do you think?