the president of the department in court for offering a wolf tail

the president of the department in court for offering a wolf tail

the president of the department in court for offering a wolf tail

Jean-Marie Bernard will be tried Monday for detention, transport and transfer of part of a protected species.

Article written by

the president of the department in court for offering a wolf tail

Posted the 02/14/2021 09:54

Update the 02/14/2021 10:03 AM

Reading time : 1 min.

Political act or offense against a protected species? The president of the Hautes-Alpes Departmental Council, Jean-Marie Bernard, appears Monday February 15 before the Gap criminal court for offering a wolf tail to the prefect Cécile Bigot-Dekeyzer, during her departure ceremony in February 2020. A “political act” which he then claimed to defend the breeders, faced with canine attacks on their cattle.

Several associations for the defense of the environment had taken justice and the investigation opened by the prosecution had resulted in December in an appearance in preliminary recognition of guilt (CRPC) that the elected official had rejected. Jean-Marie Bernard is therefore tried for “possession, transport and transfer of a part of a protected species”, an offense punishable by three years in prison and a fine of 150,000 euros. “Given the political dimension, this trial should never have taken place”, considers Philippe Neveu, lawyer of the elected.

It was “a wink that I wanted to make and a strong gesture: the prefects come by, the wolf stays and the breeders are always so desperate”, Jean-Marie Bernard (LR) told AFP in February 2020. According to the defense, Jean-Marie Bernard “is neither near nor far a poacher”. He would have found this tail on his mailbox a few weeks before the ceremony and would be “unable to tell if it’s a wolf tail”.

For associations, no doubt. “It’s a wolf’s tail that comes from an animal that has not been legally taken”, assures Mathieu Victoria, the lawyer of the League for the protection of birds (LPO) who filed a complaint, genetic analysis in support. “The political act does not constitute an exception to the criminal responsibility”, he believes.

Share on twitter

Share on Facebook

Share by mail

Share link

Important Alert

Dear reader.
I hope you are in health and well.
I offer you important instructions regarding this article

    The article has been translated based on the content of the source link below these instructions
    If there is any problem related to the content, copyright, correctness of the information contained in this article, or If there are errors in the language, please leave a report below the article. or contact us via email [email protected]. We will try to process as quickly as possible to protect the rights of the author. Thank you very much!
    We only want readers to access information quickly and easily using other multilingual content, rather than information only available in a specific language.
    We always respect the copyright of the author’s content and always include the original link of the source article, and if the author does not agree, leave the report below the article, the article will be edited or deleted at the author’s request. Thank you so much! Warm greetings!

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *