There are problems with the RTV subscription. This is a significant legal loophole. What is it about

Spread the love

When the RTV subscription law was passed in 2005, it was not expected that the technology would bring chaos to the law.

 There are problems with the RTV subscription. This is a significant legal loophole. What is it?</p><p> There is, however, a point which the legislator has not made. We are talking about receivers that are not able to process the signal and are not connected to the antenna.</p><h2> The legislator did not provide for any other technological solutions. He did not make the appropriate changes</h2><p style = The radio and television subscription covers everyone who has a radio and television receiving device in the household. Their owners are currently obliged to pay PLN 24.50 per month, but this amount will increase soon.

Interestingly, about 3.7 million users. This includes people over 75 years of age, disabled, and, among others, disabled in war or destroyed during the Polish People's Republic.

As we know, the law drafted in 2005 was not able to predict the direction in which technological development is going in the reception of television and radio content. Therefore, the provision that defines the conditions for the payment of radio and television fees raises doubts.

It is said that the owners of receiving devices, which are technically adapted to receive RTV services and connected to the antenna, have to pay. As it turns out, however, many people use other forms of reproducing the media, such as streaming platforms, which set their own fees for viewing the content featured there.

Should these people also pay for the RTV subscription? Aleksandra Kolbusz, an expert from Media law firm, explains – Whether the obligation to pay the subscription fee arises or not does not raise any doubts in the case of standard TV sets and radios. Meanwhile, other equipment provided by modern technology guarantees the reception in a slightly different way. Moreover, sometimes in their case, the reception does not apply to a television or radio program at all. Therefore, it is not uncontested whether the subscription obligation should apply to them and whether the holder of such a device should consequently pay a subscription.

What do you think about it?

Previous Article
Next Article