Censorship motions: pressure strokes in the constituencies that can sometimes make you think

< img class = "responsive-Img" SRC = "https://images.midilibre.fr/api/v1/images/view/67a4e6331445220b015731a9/lange/image.jpg?v=1" Alt = "This Tuesday, in the National Assembly, when two censorship motions were rejected." >This Tuesday, in the National Assembly, when two motions of censorship were rejected. Maxppp – Arnaud César Vilette < P Class = "Article-Full__CoPo" > The anger and amp; impatience often expressed in their constituency also prompted socialist deputies or national rally to refuse to vote the last motions of censorship.

< P >By not voting the motion of censorship deposited by rebellious France, the Socialist Party and the National Rally allowed the French State to have a budget for 2025, and to François Bayrou to stay in Matignon. A double outcome that may have played two months earlier, a few hours after the fall of the Barnier government, victim of censorship. < P > A sling wind then risen, against around thirty parliamentarians who had voted this censorship, and who had seen their permanence, in their constituency, vandalized by farmers. < H2 Class = "TXT-INT" > “Vandalized permanences” < P > They deplored the consequences of this censorship and the non-deption of a budget, such as the suspension of the aid promised by the government to respond to the agricultural crisis. < P >RN permanence had notably been walled or coated with slurry, a great first for this party, hitherto spared by this kind of anger movements. What give to think for the following motion ? < H2 Class = "TXT-INT" > “We have shown responsibility” < P > In fact, for that discussed and voted this week, < em > “on the side of our activists, it was shared. Censor or not ? This varied according to the regions, the Socio-professional categories… “ observed Thursday the RN deputy of Hérault Aurélien Lopez-Liguori. According to which < EM > “We were faced with two poor choices: this budget does not settle anything, even if it is less worse than the Barnier budget, but if we censored a new budget at the end of April, without Guarantee to have a better one… “. < P > So continued his counterpart from the Gard Yoann Gillet, also spokesperson for the RN, < EM >“We have shown responsibility. We needed a budget (*) < EM >, even if it remains bad. But not having had heavy consequences for the French, programming laws could not have been applied. 60 ~/P > < H2 Class = "TXT-INT" > “For these elected officials, the pressure can be strong, it weighed” < P >< EM > “For these elected officials, the pressure can be strong when they return to their constituency. Two in three French people said they were favorable to the adoption of a budget, so it weighed very heavy, at the PS as at the RN “ noted the Montpellier political scientist Michel Crespy. < P > The socialist deputy of Hérault Fanny Dombre-Coste confirmed: < EM >“I went around all the municipalities in my constituency, I was told a lot. Everything was blocked, and there was a real expectation, of the economic world, of associations, of the general population. And even if This budget is not far enough, we have obtained notable advances. < H2 Class = "TXT-INT" > “The compromise path” < P > and the socialist senator Audois Sébastien Pla did not say anything else when he told us Thursday: < EM > “We could not leave the country without budget, we must not play with the Fire, and we would have gone against the will of the population. The RN seized the Constitutional Council to censor four articles of this 2025 finance bill “which appear to be contravening the Constitution”. I subscribe to read more200% Deposit Bonus up to €3,000 180% First Deposit Bonus up to $20,000