Drama in Millas: the decision made this Friday for the driver of the school bus after the accident who killed six middle school students in 2017

< Iframe Frameborder = "0" Scrolling = "No" Marginwidth = "0" Marginheight = "0" Hspace = "0" Vspace = "0" Webkitallowfulscreen = "True" mozallowfulllscreen = "alllow" = "Autoplay" RetrierPolicy = "No-Referrer-Ohen-Downgrade" Width = "500" Height = "300" style = "Width: 100%; Height: 100%; Position: Absolute;" Data-digiteka-src = "//www.ultimedia.com/deliver/generic/iframe/mdtk/01914874/src/x8qrvl3/zone/1/showtitle/1/sound/yes/">6 > < img class = "responsive-Img" src = "https://medialb.ultimedia.com/multi/3zflp/x8qrvl3-o.jpg" >< P Class = "Article-Full__CoPo" >Seven years after the drama of Millas, where six college students died in a collision between a school bus and a ter, the court of the appeal of aix-en-provence will return Friday 7 & nbsp; Regarding the potential responsibility of the bus driver.

< p > seven years after the death of six college students in the collision between a school bus and a TER in Millas (Pyrénées-Orientales), the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal will return its decision on Friday a possible responsibility of the bus driver. < P >The deliberation will be pronounced at 2:00 p.m. and broadcast live at the Perpignan courthouse for families who could not make the trip to the Bouches-du-Rhône. < P > During his requisitions, the Advocate General had claimed against Nadine Oliveira a more severe sentence than that of first instance, or five years in prison, two years firm, accompanied by a cancellation of all his licenses to drive, a ban on passing them for five years and finally a ban on carrying out any activity in the transport sector. 200% Deposit Bonus up to €3,000 180% First Deposit Bonus up to $20,000

< P > This second trial had been requested by the accused, 55, after his sentence at first instance at five years in prison, one year of which was firm, in November 2022, for homicides and involuntary injuries. These debates, from October 7 to 25, 2024, had been a test for the civil parties because they had taken place largely without Mme Oliveira.

< P >< EM >“We are waiting for the conviction to be confirmed or even aggravated and we hope that it is the end of this fight. It was she, the driver, who wanted this second trial and she disappeared again, so it was complicated to manage For families “, explained to AFP Me Vanessa Brandone, who represents several families among the 120 civil parties of this file. < P > Nadine Oliveira, who has always maintained, against numerous testimonies and expertise, that the barriers of the level crossing were lifted, had a discomfort from the third day of the appeal trial, just after listening to Testimonials of adolescents present in the accidental bus. She was then hospitalized and had missed the rest of the debates. < P >According to one of her advice, Me Jean Codognès, she had a “broken heart syndrome”, exactly as at the first trial she had already missed. Her presence on Friday is suspended from a medical decision: < em > “she wants to be there, unless a medical certificate contraindicated him” , he explains at AFP. < P > His lawyers had again pleaded a relaxation. < H2 Class = "TXT-INT" > Exhaust < P > Since the start of the investigation, Nadine Oliveira argues that the barriers of the Millas level crossing were lifted when she was committed with her bus, violently struck by a TER this December 14, 2017, Killing six children and injuring 17 other middle school students, including eight seriously. < P >< EM > “I appealed because the barriers were lifted” , had it reiterated at the beginning of this second trial. < /p > < P >A version widely denied by many witnesses. Motorists located opposite, on the other side of the passage, had thus seen the car < EM > “push the barrier, as we open a door” . Likewise one of the college students sitting everything at the front of the bus described that the vehicle had ~ 60 > “Tapped the barriers” . ~. < P > This passenger, who was 13 years old at the time of the facts, lost a leg in the drama. < P > At the start of the appeal trial, the attitude of the driver, inflexible on her version of the facts and who has never given an apology for the accident that she is accused of having provoked , had caused the nervousness of certain victims, such as Enzo, who had launched: < EM > “She destroyed lives, […] excuses, that would be so much better” . < P > Many now hope that she will not go to Cassation if she was again condemned. < EM > “She is quite exhausted” by this journey judicial, confined itself to indicating at this stage its lawyer.

I subscribe to read more