© Pexels
Faced with soaring energy prices and growing environmental concerns, choosing the right heating system is becoming crucial . Homeowners often find themselves lost between the different options available on the market: heat pump, pellet stove, gas system… Each installer extols the merits of their solution. But what is it really like ? A team of German researchers is finally providing concrete answers based on scientific data.
The scientists did not do things by halves. To obtain reliable results, they simulated the operation of 13 different heating systems in a typical two-story house. Their innovative approach combines life cycle analysis (LCA) to assess the environmental impact and net present value (NPV) to measure economic viability. This dual analysis makes it possible to identify solutions that truly perform well in all respects.
The team took all the parameters into account: installation costs, energy consumption, maintenance costs, but also CO2 emissions and the use of natural resources. The researchers even included in their calculations the probable evolution of energy prices and future changes in the German electricity mix.
© Pixabay/Pexels
200% Deposit Bonus up to €3,000 180% First Deposit Bonus up to $20,000The results are clear: the air heat pump -water coupled with photovoltaic panels tops the ranking in terms of eco-efficiency. This system has a 17% lower environmental impact than the reference (gas boiler) while reducing costs by 6%. Even in the worst-case scenarios considered by the researchers, this solution remains more efficient than many alternatives.
The remarkable performance of this duo can be explained by several factors. First, the air-water heat pump efficiently exploits the energy present in the outside air. Then, the addition of photovoltaic panels significantly reduces the electricity bill and the carbon footprint of the system. The researchers even point out that optimizing photovoltaic self-consumption could further improve these results.
The wood gasification boiler ranks surprisingly well, coming in second place in terms of eco-efficiency. It has a 42% lower environmental impact than the gas boiler, despite a 20% higher cost. This good result is explained in particular by the consideration of wood as a renewable resource, provided that it comes from sustainable forest management.
On the other hand, some systems considered ecological disappoint. The pellet boiler combined with solar thermal and the heat pump with ice accumulator have the lowest performances in terms of eco-efficiency. The researchers explain that the complexity of these systems and their high cost do not compensate for their environmental advantages.
The gas boiler, although economical to use, is penalized by its significant environmental impact. It generates the highest greenhouse gas emissions of all the systems studied, even when coupled with solar thermal panels.
📍 To not miss any news from Lemon Squeezer, follow us on Google News and WhatsApp.
[ ]
Roman Chabanon, né à Mende, travaille au centre Gustave-Roussy, à Paris. DR - DR The…
Vladimir Poutine a annoncé en début d'année que la Russie était sur le point de…
Un recrutement atypique qui pose de nombreuses questions. 0 𝕏 © Olena Yakobchuk / Shutterstock…
Les faits se sont déroulés dans cette épicerie de La Seyne-sur-Mer. MAXPPP - LE PARC…
Clément Gras et les Krokos n’ont pas su concrétiser leurs occasions. Midi Libre - Alejandro…
© Olena Yakobchuk/Shutterstock Are our chatbots overworked ? Do they feel belittled or mistreated ? These questions,…