Me Greenspan cross-examines complainant no. 5 on October 17, 2023.
The man specified that the complainant had told him in their relationship, during a stay in Edmonton, that she had had a mishap with a fashion celebrity she had not identified at the time.
I was in the military, only 26 years old and knew nothing about women's clothing, he said.
He added that she told him that day that she had been to an interview for a job but it had gone badly. She told me about a hidden room on the top floor of a workshop, he remembers.
He understood that she had been assaulted but that the individual had mainly reprimanded her verbally in bed. I didn't really think it was rape, he stressed.
Open in full screen mode
Complainant No. 5 told the defense that Peter Nygard raped her in 1988 or 1989 in his former fashion workshop in Toronto.
To hearing the testimony of the sixty-year-old, we were able to understand that the meeting between Peter Nygard and the complainant was brutal and sinister. I was shocked because no one talked like that back then, he said.
He claimed that he saw Peter Nygard years later on television during a business trip on June 14, 2020 and that the report tipped him off. .
I sent him a text message with the letters PN and two question marks, he mentioned.
p>Open in full screen mode
Complainant #5 swore that the sexual relationship she had with Peter Nygard was not at all consensual and that he It was rape.
He explained that he contacted her that day because he had felt like he hadn't supported her when she revealed her secret to him in Edmonton.
I wanted to apologize because attitudes about rape had changed over time, he said.
He acknowledged telling her in 2020 that the experience would be very painful when she asked if she should report to the police.
I told her Mr. Nygard would hire excellent lawyers and they would destroy her if there was a trial, he said.
The man, however, clarified that he then encouraged her in January 2021 when he called her back to warn him that the police had contacted him to corroborate his statement. I thanked her on behalf of my two daughters, he said.
The defense, however, revealed contradictions in his cross-examination by having him reread his statement to the police in 2021.
The man had said to the police that his ex-wife had agreed to see Peter Nygard again to advance his career in the world of entertainment.
Open in full screen mode
Mr. Greenspan noted unfortunate contradictions in the statement of the ex-husband of complainant no. 5 to the police.
She told me said he had kissed her in the elevator when going up to her suite, he admitted. The complainant omitted this detail in her testimony.
He noted that she told him in Edmonton that she was wearing a skirt that evening. However, she said on Monday that she was wearing pants.
He claimed that she had also revealed to him that Peter Nygard had tried to kiss her again in the secret room but she had rebuffed his advances at first before accepting them.
No, she never told me that he overpowered her on the bed or abused her, he concluded.
Open in full screen mode
Peter Nygard and Mr. Greenspan listen to the Crown's response after the cross-examination of the ex-husband of Complainant No. 5.
Disconcerted, the Crown however reminded him in his right of reply that the complainant had not revealed to him in Edmonton all the details of the alleged assault.
She had a British accent, her speech was different from ours, but her story was heartbreaking, he explained.
Earlier in the morning, the Crown had clarified the chronology of events in the complainant's testimony thanks to the testimony of the owner of Chez Henri.
Walter Grego confirmed that the complainant first met Peter Nygard in June 1988 and not in 1987 as she had said.
Consequence: rape alleged occurred a few months later in 1989 and not in 1988 as she had also pointed out.
The trial was was adjourned until Monday.
Jean-Philippe Nadeau (View profile)Jean-Philippe NadeauFollow
Post navigation